MOVIE REVIEWS |
INTERVIEWS |
YOUTUBE |
NEWS
|
EDITORIALS | EVENTS |
AUDIO |
ESSAYS |
ARCHIVES |
CONTACT
|
PHOTOS |
COMING SOON|
EXAMINER.COM FILM ARTICLES
||HOME
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
MOVIE REVIEW
Cosmopolis
He's Got The W(hole)
World In His Hand, And Zero Fulfillment
Robert Pattinson as Eric Packer in David Cronenberg's "Cosmopolis".
Entertainment One
by
Omar P.L. Moore/PopcornReel.com
FOLLOW
Tuesday, August 28,
2012
David Cronenberg follows the
disappointing "A
Dangerous Method" with "Cosmopolis", a moody, brooding psychodrama
based on Don DeLillo's novel. The film recently opened in select theaters
in the U.S. and Canada.
Set just a few years into the future, 28-year-old New York City billionaire
asset manager Eric Packer (Robert Pattinson) has the world at his feet -- except
the Yuan currency -- which is doing things he doesn't want it to in a volatile
financial market he is hedging against. Eric, hemorrhaging millions by the
hour, is resigned to his rapidly-shifting economic status as he sits in his
stretch limousine, a phallic office into which many advisers, clients, sexual
servicers and his Pollyanna wife (Sarah Gadon) visit. Eric is incubated
(albeit tenuously) from rat-dangling and crawling protesters in Times Square who
warn that "a specter is haunting the world." Trapped in traffic, all Eric
wants, it seems, is a darn haircut. He's just trying to get to his
father's barber.
"Cosmopolis" is a slow, haunting and anesthetizing look at the day in the banal
life of a man who longs to feel something, longs to be penetrated. In
varied moments Eric is penetrated on several levels. Yet it isn't
enough. He's spiritually dead, exhausted by material excess, financial
comforts and, despite such wealth, a lack of freedom and autonomy.
Surrounded by robotic people who tell him what he wants to hear, Eric is
shackled physically and mentally to security guards, limo drivers and analysts.
He's trapped by his success and insulated from his fears. Eric's living a
frozen experience in his head, real enough yet numbing to him.
Like "Eyes Wide
Shut", "Cosmopolis" plays as the waking dream of a man having an
internal conversation rather than one with those who inhabit his mobile motor
office. Mr. Cronenberg's drama does little more than drop a near-inanimate
Mr. Pattinson into a role suited to his lack of onscreen warmth, a virtual
automaton in big screen interactions. Still, the largely unremarkable "Cosmopolis"
is at least interesting as a philosophical musing about an alienating,
technological and job-starved age where the haves and have-nots come to an
uneasy meeting point.
The director doesn't stimulate "Cosmopolis" or its anarchic visions beyond
surface-level sleekness and bleakness. Mr. Pattinson's ice-cool,
trance-like detachment works perfectly for this material adapted by Mr.
Cronenberg from Mr. DeLillo's novel. Eric is an idea, a metaphor, an
in-flux model of noblesse oblige, not so much a live flesh-and-blood figure.
We're not expected to identify with him as he journeys through his empty
existence. As a money man Eric faces threats and if the Notorious B.I.G.
adage "more money, more problems" isn't applicable here nothing is.
Throughout, characters engage in passionless conversation and banter.
There's occasional suspense in the sometimes sinister way they speak, and if you
haven't read the novel you hardly know what to expect from them next.
"Cosmopolis" ponders the idea of a more aggressive recession and revolt in kind
by populist movements. The film is timely not only because of the slow
economy but because of the ongoing Occupy movements in the U.S. and elsewhere
that target "the 1%" who owns more than 90% of the world's wealth. Someone
close to me recently said that "everyone wants to be a billionaire." That
may be true but sometimes billionaires may want to be someone else and somewhere
else, so as to be anything but an easy target for wrath.
The antiseptic atmosphere of New York City drew me into Mr. Cronenberg's film.
The director, whose visceral approach in films is potent, melds themes he often
visits in his work: the merging of the organic/machinery and psychological, and
the tension between them all ("Crash", "Dead Ringers", "A History Of Violence",
"A Dangerous Method", "Existenz".) The director engages the physical realm
in his lead character; Eric is always searching for a hole or void to be filled
or exploded. Eric remarks in a muted eureka-like manner about his
"asymmetrical prostate". He's alive enough to have lucid thoughts,
requests and desires for sex from his trophy wife but dead enough not to
appreciate the orgasmic thrills sex brings. "I want you to give me the
full voltage," Eric says after one sexual encounter. No matter how much
penetration the ever-contemplative, analytical Eric receives -- sex, mutilation,
proctologic exams -- he just can't feel. When the body becomes an empty
vessel, it's time for the mind to revolt.
Where "Red Hook
Summer" is a symphony of shrill, urgent voices yearning to be heard
in New York City, "Cosmopolis" is a numbness of voices amidst a primal scream
for change in the Big Apple. As entertainment "Cosmopolis" is admittedly
alienating and distant. There's little energy or plot to hook the viewer
into direct investment in or identification with Eric, whose eternal, faraway
nothingness makes him all the more susceptible to radical awakening. "Cosmopolis",
a collection of small, intimate conversation pieces, simply solicits your
interest in absorbing a head trip of Eric's existential state, not necessarily
commitment to Eric as a character.
If you're willing to think of "Cosmopolis" as orifice therapy it will likely
work for you. If not, you might readily abandon it. "Cosmopolis"
ended up working for me, and it's the kind of subdued film that will at least
leave some of Mr. Cronenberg's fans (if not Mr. Pattinson's) intrigued.
Also with: Kevin Durand, Juliette Binoche, Samantha Morton, Paul Giamatti,
Patricia McKenzie, Abdul Ayoola, Emily Hampshire, Jay Baruchel, Gouchy Boy,
Mathieu Almaric, K'Naan.
"Cosmopolis" is rated
R by the Motion Picture Association Of America for
some strong sexual content including graphic
nudity, violence and language. The film's
running time is one hour and 48 minutes.
COPYRIGHT 2012. POPCORNREEL.COM. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
FOLLOW
MOVIE REVIEWS |
INTERVIEWS |
YOUTUBE |
NEWS
|
EDITORIALS | EVENTS |
AUDIO |
ESSAYS |
ARCHIVES |
CONTACT
| PHOTOS |
COMING SOON|
EXAMINER.COM FILM ARTICLES
||HOME