MOVIE REVIEWS | INTERVIEWS | YOUTUBE NEWS EDITORIALS | EVENTS | AUDIO | ESSAYS | ARCHIVES | CONTACT |
 
PHOTOS | COMING SOON| EXAMINER.COM FILM ARTICLES ||
HOME

                                                           
Friday, May 14, 2010

MOVIE REVIEW
Robin Hood
I, Sir Robert.  The King and You: Not Impressed.


Russell Crowe as Sir Robert "Robin" Loxley and Cate Blanchett as Lady Marion Loxley in Ridley Scott's "Robin Hood", which opened today across the U.S. and Canada. 
Universal Pictures

By Omar P.L. Moore/PopcornReel.com        Follow popcornreel on Twitter FOLLOW 
Friday, May 14, 2010

Ridley Scott's "Robin Hood" is neither the best nor the worst big screen depiction of the mythic, folklore legend from England's Nottingham and Sheffield.  This is apparently good news, but when you're Mr. Scott, who has collaborated with actor Russell Crowe four previous times ("Gladiator", "A Good Year", "American Gangster", "Body Of Lies"), average is not what you are aiming for.

Mr. Scott is always adept at framing time, place and surroundings with great aplomb and textbook meticulousness, and does so again here with the locales representing England and France.  Where he falters however, is focus, specifically the mechanics to tighten the story accompanying the visuals into a solid, coherent adventure.  The camerawork, arguably the biggest enemy of the film, roams like the wandering eye of a serial adulterer.  Numerous tracking shots, crane shots and long lens shots wallow in the festive scenes of beautiful green landscape and the overall production design. 

But story-wise, many will find "Robin Hood" difficult to engage.  Robin of Loxley (Mr. Crowe) is carefully shown, from his humble roots of commoner folk to respected leader and fighter for the people.  He rounds up a band of men to fight the onslaught of the French before challenging the King of England's rule and treatment of the poor.  It's not that Brian Helgeland's script is a disaster -- far from it.  The screenplay is better at cultivating a mood and camaraderie between the players than it is structurally adept at connecting threads of episodic development in its various scenes.  Often we shuttle back and forth between France and England without appreciating why we are even taken there at a specific moment in time.  It's as if the script is incomplete and the camerawork serves as filler.

The film's tone shifts from action to romance and then back to action for a grandstand Hollywood finish.  In between, there are a litany of characters -- Friar Tuck, Little John (lots of fun is made of his name) and a variety of others.  Adding a bit of gender balance to the testosterone equation is this day's birthday lady Cate Blanchett, who ably and entertainingly shines as Lady Marion.  Stubborn, principled and brittle, Marion has her charm and strength independently from the title character, and she's every bit up for the fight.  Mr. Crowe, who was one of the film's producers, is adequate as Robin, grasping the English period accent well, but he's done better work for Mr. Scott than in this film.

With "Robin Hood: Prince Of Thieves" in mind, while watching Mr. Scott's latest viewers will inevitably look at films like "Elizabeth" (in which Ms. Blanchett starred), "Gladiator" (in which Mr. Crowe starred) and "Braveheart" (in which neither starred) and compare and contrast.  The first film had a great performance, the second was "Spartacus"-like theater and the third was fire, fury and bloodshed.  Sadly, "Robin Hood", while fun and entertaining at times, seems to have exhausted the period genre, for as a film it is tired, leaden and too long.  You can almost see it running out of steam, or at least taking long pauses for breaths, pauses that could have been edited from view.

With: William Hurt, Mark Strong, Eileen Atkins, Mark Addy, Oscar Isaacs, Danny Huston (this reviewer didn't notice or recognize him in the film!) and Max Von Sydow.

"Robin Hood" is rated PG-13 by the Motion Picture Association Of America for violence, including intense sequences of warfare, and some sexual content.  The film is in the English and French languages with occasional English subtitles.  The film's running time is two hours and twenty-seven minutes.


COPYRIGHT 2010.  POPCORNREEL.COM.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.                   Follow popcornreel on Twitter
FOLLOW


Read more movie reviews and stories from Omar here.

Read Omar's "Far-Flung Correspondent" reports for America's pre-eminent Film Critic Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times - here



SUBSCRIBE TO THE POPCORN REEL MOVIE REVIEWS RSS FEED
"movie reviews" via popcornreel in Google Reader

MOVIE REVIEWS | INTERVIEWS | YOUTUBE NEWS EDITORIALS | EVENTS | AUDIO | ESSAYS | ARCHIVES | CONTACT |
 
PHOTOS | COMING SOON| EXAMINER.COM FILM ARTICLES ||
HOME